Issue 84127 - runner: dbaccess.SbaXGridControl::com::sun::star::awt::XWindow
Summary: runner: dbaccess.SbaXGridControl::com::sun::star::awt::XWindow
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: App Dev
Classification: Unclassified
Component: api (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-30 15:13 UTC by chne
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: TASK
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description chne 2007-11-30 15:13:26 UTC 
while running API-Tests of
dbaccess.SbaXGridControl::com::sun::star::awt::XWindow the method "getPosSize()"
freeze the office.

To reproduce this behavior just start your office with parameter

"-accept=socket,host=0,port=8100;urp;" 

and call inside a solar shell:

checkapi -o dbaccess.SbaXGridControl::com::sun::star::awt::XWindow
Comment 1 ocke.janssen 2007-12-03 10:45:02 UTC 
Please take care for this one. Thanks.
Comment 2 Frank Schönheit 2008-01-07 12:57:38 UTC 
won't be able to do this for 2.4, code freeze is too near. Re-targeting to 3.0.
Comment 3 Frank Schönheit 2008-03-06 14:32:38 UTC 
Cannot reproduce with DEV300m1 on wntmsci11, going to try other platforms.
Comment 4 Frank Schönheit 2008-03-06 15:00:26 UTC 
Cannot reproduce on unxlngi6.

fs->cn: Could you please verify you indeed get this error in DEV300m1?

Also, note that on Linux, the test claims to fail, because when a
"setVisible(true)" is done on the control, then the test expects that
"windowMoved" of a XWindowListener is *not* called. Actually, on Linux it seems
it *is* called. However, I would be surprised if this is really a fixable bug -
the notification, AFAIK, heavily depends on the user window toolkit, and the
fact that in this case, making a window visible results in a notification
"windowMoved" is probably beyond OOo's control. I suggest adjusting the test
cases, to not test for windowMoved there.
Comment 5 Frank Schönheit 2008-03-06 15:01:25 UTC 
WORKSFORME - see above
Comment 6 chne 2008-03-13 19:38:54 UTC 
hmm, I can not reproduce currently, but the test fails.
Comment 7 chne 2008-03-13 19:39:19 UTC 
accepted
Comment 8 chne 2009-04-20 09:23:20 UTC 
change owner