Issue 51625 - one cell in a writer table is not selected
Summary: one cell in a writer table is not selected
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: App Dev
Classification: Unclassified
Component: api (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-07-06 10:28 UTC by steffen.grund
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:06 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Sample document with macro (7.51 KB, application/octet-stream)
2005-07-08 10:22 UTC, thomas.lange 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description steffen.grund 2005-07-06 10:28:02 UTC 
to reproduce, insert a table in the document and execute:

	xText = ThisComponent.getText()
	xSelectionSupplier = ThisComponent.getCurrentController()
	xEnum = xText.createEnumeration()
	xTextTable = xEnum.nextElement()
	xCellRange = xTextTable.getCellRangeByName("A1:A1")
	xSelectionSupplier.select(xCellRange)

This works, if more than one cell is used, e.g. "A1:B1".
Comment 1 thomas.lange 2005-07-06 15:06:41 UTC 
.
Comment 2 christianjunker 2005-07-07 23:13:56 UTC 
Alright, reproduced for both 680 and 645 builds. Can we still get a possible fix
in 1.1.5 possibly? (tl?)
Comment 3 thomas.lange 2005-07-08 10:22:50 UTC 
Created attachment 27785 [details]
Sample document with macro
Comment 4 thomas.lange 2005-07-08 10:38:17 UTC 
TL->FME: The problem is in SwCrsrShell::UpdateCrsr 
we need to pass the if statement

:	if( ( pTstCrsr->HasMark() &&
:		  pDoc->IsIdxInTbl( pTstCrsr->GetPoint()->nNode ) &&
:		  ( pTblCrsr ||
:			pTstCrsr->GetNode( TRUE )->FindStartNode() !=
:			pTstCrsr->GetNode( FALSE )->FindStartNode() ))
:  	    )

then everything will be fine.

In order for this we need a function the explicitly fills 'pTblCrsr' member with
the correct values.

Please take over thanks!
Comment 5 steffen.grund 2005-07-27 15:55:15 UTC 
retarget to Office later: too much rework needed for the fix.